BEFORE THE HEARING BOARD OF THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION
AND
DISIPLINARY COMMISSION CHICAGO OFFICE
CLERK’S OFFICE
130 East Randolph Drive, Suite 1100
Chicago, Illinois 60601-6219
(312) 565-2600 Ph.
800-826-8625 Toll free Ph.
(312) 565-1806 FAX
William W. Dunlap, Petitioner,
Katherine Szot, Third party witness,
Petitioner Case
Civil Action No: 09-cv-00597-ZLW
Civil Action No: 09-cv-00597-BNB
Civil Action No: 1:05-cv-00715-MSK-MJW
Civil Action No: 05-OES-715
vs
United States of America,United States Attorneys Office, United States Department of the Treasury and Financial Management Service, Department of Regulatory Agency Civil Rights,Department of Motor Vehicle, United States Department of Education, Child Support Enforcement Unit, Child Support, Oracle Corporation, Internal Revenue Office 206, Cricket communications, Verizon Wireless, Comcast, Lincoln Springs Apartments, Berkshire Apartments,Federal Bureau of Investigations, Department of Justice, Doug Lamborn Office,Jimmy Holden, Ron Leathers, Kristine Young,
Ken Salazar’s Office,
Colorado Attorney Regulation Office,
Colorado District Attorneys Office,
Colorado Springs Police Departments,
Colorado 4th Judicial Court Complex Bldg.,
Barack Hussein Obama, Attorney,
John Does, to be joined to this Civil Action,
Et Al., Respondent(s).
FORMAL COMPLAINT
Mr. William W. Dunlap, Petitioner, upon information and belief, states the following:
COMPLAINT
1. Respondent, Barack Hussein Obama, claims to be licensed to practice law in Illinois in 2008, and by virtue of alleged license is a member of the State Bar of Illinois who is subject to the jurisdiction of the Illinois Supreme Court and the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission in matters of discipline for professional misconduct.
2. Respondent last maintained an office for the practice of law in the County of Cook, Illinois State .
3. As an attorney subject to the rules and regulations of the Illinois Supreme Court, respondent is subject to the standards for discipline set forth in Article Vlll of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct.
4. As attorney subject to the rules and regulations of the Illinois Supreme Court, respondent is charged, with the following duties and responsibilities:
a. To refrain from engaging in conduct prejudicial to the proper administration of justice;
b. To refrain from engaging in conduct contrary to justice, ethics, honesty, or good morals;
c. To refrain from engaging in conduct that subjects the legal profession to obloquy, contempt, censure, or reproach.
COUNT ONE
5. On or about December 17, 1991, Barack Hussein Obama was admitted to practice law in the State of Illinois . On his Bar Admission Application he stated that he was born in Hawaii when in fact he was born in Kenya, Africa . At no time has Barack Hussein Obama attempt to correct his mistakes or to inform the Commission or Courts of his dishonesty.
6. By reason of the conduct outlined above, Respondent has engaged in the following misconduct:
a. conduct that violated Rule 8.1 (a) (1) and (2) Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Colo. RPC 1.6; and
b. conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice in violation of Rule 8.4(a)(5) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct; and
c. conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice, or to bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute, in violation of Supreme Court Rule 771: and
d. Including, but not limited to, these laws including Obstruction of Justice, RICO, racketeering laws, laws against filing false information in the public records, laws against fraud upon the Court, negligence, and The Penal Code making it a felony for a public official (officer of the Court)to violate offenses at common law i.e. Obstruction of Justice (Blackstones, Commentaries(1890), pp(161-177):
1. Perjury
2. Barratry
3. Police misconduct
4. False arrest and imprisonment
5. Obstruction of Justice
6. Judicial Misconduct
7. Unlawful deprivation of territorial jurisdiction in the United States of America of rights and laws.
COUNT TWO
8. Petitioner re-alleges, as if recited verbatim, the factual statements set forth in Count One of this Complaint.
9. On or about December 17, 1991, Barack Hussein Obama was admitted to practice law in the State of Illinois . On his Bar Admission Application he did not declare that he was also known as A/K/A: Barry Soetoro; Barry Obama; Barack Dunham; and Barry Dunham. At no time has Barack Hussein Obama attempt to correct his mistakes or to inform the Commission or Courts of his dishonesty. Furthermore, these A/K/A names were used on passports and college applications to receive foreign student aid.
10. By reason of the conduct outlined above, Respondent has engaged in the following misconduct:
a. conduct that violated Rule 8.1 (a)(1 and (2) Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters of the Rules of Professional Conduct; and
b. conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice in violation of Rule 8.4(a)(5) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct; and
c. conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice, or to bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute, in violation of Supreme Court Rule 771: and
d. Including, but not limited to, these laws including Obstruction of Justice, RICO, racketeering laws, laws against filing false information in the public records, laws against fraud upon the Court, negligence, and The Penal Code making it a felony for a public official (officer of the Court)to violate offenses at common law i.e. Obstruction of Justice (Blackstones, Commentaries(1890), pp(161-177):
1. Perjury
2. Barratry
3. Police misconduct
4. False arrest and imprisonment
5. Obstruction of Justice
6. Judicial Misconduct
7. Unlawful deprivation of territorial jurisdiction in the United States of America of rights and laws.
COUNT THREE
11. Petitioner re-alleges, as if recited verbatim, the factual statements set forth in Count One and Two of this complaint.
12. During 2008, Barack Hussein Obama declared to 50 Secretary of States, including Illinois that he was eligible to run for the office of the Presidency of the United States and was a “natural born citizen” even though it was common knowledge that his father was a Kenyan citizen.
Barack Osama’s 2008 Presidential website clearly states that he had dual citizenship and his father was a Kenyan/British citizen. This is a violation of the US Constitution Article ll, Section l, Clause 5.
13. By reason of the conduct outlined above, Respondent has engaged in the following misconduct:
a. conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice in violation of Rule 8.4(a)(5) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct; and
b. conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice, or to bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute, in violation of Supreme Court Rule 771: and
c. Including, but not limited to, these laws including Obstruction of Justice, RICO, racketeering laws, laws against filing false information in the public records, laws against fraud upon the Court, negligence, and The Penal Code making it a felony for a public official (officer of the Court)to violate offenses at common law i.e. Obstruction of Justice (Blackstones, Commentaries(1890), pp(161-177):
1. Perjury
2. Barratry
3. Police misconduct
4. False arrest and imprisonment
5. Obstruction of Justice, and destruction of evidence upon due diligence to report a crime to legal officers.
6. Judicial Misconduct
7. Unlawful deprivation of territorial jurisdiction in the United States of America of rights and laws.
COUNT FOUR
15. Petitioner re-alleges, as if recited verbatim, the factual statements set forth in Count One through Three of this complaint.
16. That these representations made by Respondent were false, and were known to Respondent to be false at the time they were made. “Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional Right from liability. For they are deemed to know the law.” Owen v Independence 100 S.C.T. 1398
17. That Respondent acting in concert with other state actors, by slander, impersonating a state official, bias, intimidation, fraud, mail fraud, unauthorized practice of law, have violated Petitioner’s Constitutional Rights, as well Unfair Trade Practice Laws and the Consumer Protection Act Laws and barratry.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
18. A Temporary Restraining Order restraining Respondent from exercising any duties of any state or federal office held, or the practice of law, pending disposition of this Petition.
19. That Respondent is denied any and all emoluments he may have been entitled to.
20. That the Respondent be declared in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. {{} {} 2382, and 2384 and the 14th Amendment, {}3 of the Constitution of the United States of America .
21. All other relief that Petitioner is entitled to pursuant to F.R.C.P. 54(c) in the amount of $250, 170, 263.93 JUDGMENT ORDER FOR FORFEITURE on Jan 20, 2007 in default, over thirty false arrests and warrants, obstruction of justice, police misconduct, judicial misconduct, wantonly beat for trying to enforce rights under the laws, deprived of rights and laws - TITLES 28 U.S.C. 1343 and 28 U.S.C. 1443(1)(2), and Treble damages - TITLE 42 U.S.C. 1983.
22. Any and all other relief that the Court deems equitable and just in the interest of justice.
23. Whoever, having taken an Oath before a competent tribunal officer or person in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an Oath to be administered, willfully and contrary to such Oath, states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true, is guilty of perjury and shall be fined no more than $750, 510, 791.79 or imprisoned not more than ten years or both.
Wherefore, Respondent should be subjected to such discipline as may be warranted by the facts and circumstance of such misconduct.
Dated May 17, 2009
Signed in the fifth degree
http://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/united-states-department-of-the-treasury--fms-c206527.html
-----
No comments:
Post a Comment